Holistic Consultant - Gold Coast - Canungra
Be in balance; it’s such a nice statement, and it can be as general or as specific as one likes.
I personally like the many meanings and concepts of balance, but would like to elevate it to a Holistic Philosophy.
We all know what balance means, if someone tells us; "you need more balance"; we may have overdone something, have become too one-sided or fallen of the cliff altogether. Still nothing specific here, all rather general terms meaning something is out of balance.
To see balance as a philosophy however, one has to dig deeper, find some specific meanings and apply this knowledge.
Balance is of the uppermost importance, because we do live on a planet where we need at least 2 to exist. There needs to be 2 of everything, 2 sides of a coin, yin and yang, plus and minus, negative and positive.
One by itself cannot exist, therefore to be in balance one needs the second part to be in balance with.
The whole significant of that statement may just pass us by, but on reflection we know that the natural consequence of balance is that both parts are always equal, no one side is better or worse.
Equality has nothing to do with being the same. - Picture a set of scales: on one side put 500 grams of apples on the other 500grams of pears, maybe you have a preference for one or the other, but to be in balance each weighs the same.
Everything which comes in a plural version is therefore equal, male and female are equal, different but equal.
Example, "polarity", as in a "Battery"; positive and negative pole, would anyone really think that one is better than the other?
Would it be possible, just to have the positive pole? - Sure, you can have that... but it doesn't do anything, to actually release the energy, we need both.
If something is in balance, like the positive and negative pole of a battery, energy is created.
This opens up a "new" concept - "Balance in Energy Creation".
For starters, if a man and a woman are living in balance, they will create energy, meaning, they will achieve more together than they could have achieved individually. - Sometimes, this energy is extended into Synergy, where the sum of the whole far outweighs that of the individuals.
However, if one of the couple is perceiving the other as not being an equal, no or less energy is created, down to the point, where by fighting or point scoring against each other, no energy is created at all and the outcome is zero.
Can the plurality and balance philosophy be applied to our political system? - Are they working against each other or do they create Synergy?
The misinterpretation of the word opposition as opposing has created problems. Instead of just being on the opposite side of the equation, the political concept of opposition, as in opposing everything, has created a vacuum in energy output for most political endeavours, with only little political progress made.
Political parties keep themselves busy by putting each other down, not a productive endeavour for a country.
The concept and voting, that one party is better or knows better than any other is based on ideology. - Party political reasons are the main driving force which keeps defending a righteous ideology.
A truly inspiring and working well party system instead could create synergy, resulting in a truly inspiring outcome and vision for the future.
Most of our decisions are based on right or wrong, again a balance principle. In reality there is no right and wrong as we perceive it.
Balance is always created by having 2 sides, therefore the term wrong as we see it, simply means it is part of the balance and it is needed as much as the right side.
Right and wrong are equals as much as male and female or positive and negative are equals.
This may create an outcry, "surely, to kill someone is wrong", and .. yes, it is, and we should by now understand that and stop it".
With other words, right and wrong is created by what we accept, and agree upon.
To live in balance we do something, which may be wrong, than we correct it, which may be right. We have now created balance, which has created an energy to move on, and that specific item, "killing", should be way beyond us. (Why is it still going on?)
It should be absolutely obvious that killing is out, it should have become what is called a truth, a universal value truth, where everyone agrees too.
That's what an universal value is, something we all have learnt to be true or working best for the human race, and therefore it is an agreed universal value truth.
Now we come to another principle of balance, which often is overlooked.
Not everything can be balanced, - if side side becomes too extreme, the counter weight would break the balance altogether. - Hence the phrase "it has reached breaking point".
There is only so much which can be balanced. That is not to say that everything is lost, it simply means it has to be brought closer again ... baby steps have to be made, slowly, surely reaching out to each other in order to come to the point where balance is possible once again.
Ideologies in any form are counterproductive.
The problem is NOT the ideology, which can be seen simply as an idea.
The problem is that people become self-righteous and defend their ideology to the death, because it would be simply too hard to admit being wrong.
Therefore too much valuable energy is spend on proving someone else's ideology wrong.
Interestingly, different ideologies could support a perfect balance. The differences could be seen as enriching rather than as a threat to one’s own truth.
The left leg stands still as you take the right leg forward, again and again ..
... Lets not do that ..
.. So, how to create balance in your life? Add what's missing ...
.. your comments are welcome ...
Please post comments on our Facebook Page
Please contact me directly for more info or Research Participation: Dieter L. - Editor
* Disclaimer - Any general advice given in any article should not be relied upon and should not be taken as a substitute for visiting a qualified medical Doctor.