Menu:

Expert Profile Menu
Apply for your Expert Profile Page
Expert Articles
Advertise with us
 

useNature Magazine - the Weekly Column - Tips - Info's - Stories

< Previous Article

The Sunscreen Debate

Next Article >

Article by Natural Glow Organic Beauty

The Sunscreen Debate

In a sun-drenched country like Australia, sunscreen is an absolute must for everyone when spending time in the great outdoors. Sunscreen acts as a filter & protects against the damaging effects of the Sun by reducing the amount of ultraviolet (or UV) rays that reach the skin. It extends the amount of time it takes for a person’s skin to burn when exposed to the Sun’s rays. This amount depends on the sunscreen’s SPF (Sun Protection Factor) rating. It is important to remember, however, that no sunscreen completely blocks UV radiation or provides 100% protection against UV radiation. A certain amount of UV rays will always get through damaging the cells below. This damage can build up over time, increasing a person’s risk of melanoma and other skin cancers.

A sunscreen may contain either a chemical filter or a physical filter or a combination of both.

Chemical sunscreens work by absorbing UV radiation before it can penetrate deeply into the skin and cause damage. Chemical sunscreen ingredients are molecular in size and because they are designed to be absorbed into the skin, they can get into the bloodstream. According to the Environmental Working Group's Skin Deep Cosmetic Database, a commonly used UV absorber, Oxybenzone, has been associated with allergic dermatitis and photosensitivity and may disrupt hormones. There is also debate about whether some chemical sunscreen ingredients are carcinogenic.

Physical sunscreens are designed to sit on the skin’s surface and deflect or block the Sun’s rays. They usually contain zinc oxide (ZnO) and/or titanium dioxide (TiO2) as their active ingredient/s. In conventional formulations, ZnO and TiO2 leave a white layer on the skin, but when they are reduced to nanoparticles, they become invisible while still providing broad-spectrum protection. For this reason, sunscreen with nanoparticles has become very popular in recent years. (A nanometer is equal to one billionth of a meter – nanoparticles are sized between 1 and 100 nanometers).

The use of nanoparticles in sunscreen has led to increasing concern as to whether these nanoparticles might be absorbed into viable cells below the skin’s surface, risking damage to these cells. The Therapeutic Goods Administration in Australia (TGA) has concluded in its studies and reviews of data that "the current weight of evidence suggests that TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles do not reach viable skin cells or the general circulation, but rather they remain on the skin surface and in the outer layer of the stratum corneum which is composed of non-viable, keratinized cells." Also, "potential for harm has not been demonstrated in vivo following exposure to these nanomaterials from normal sunscreen usage in short-term studies." 1

Yet the controversy surrounding nanoparticles continues and not everyone is convinced of their safety. Obviously this is an area of science where more research is warranted.

If you don’t want to take the risk with chemical UV absorbers, then look for a chemical free sunscreen that uses a blend of natural ingredients with zinc oxide as its active ingredient. And while the nano technology debate continues, you might also want to opt for a nano-particle free sunscreen.

1 Therapeutic Goods Administration Literature review on the safety of titanium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles in sunscreens. V1.0 August 2013.

8 Mar 2014

Last Update: 9 Mar 2014

Article/Information supplied by Natural Glow Organic Beauty

Disclaimer - Any general advice given in any article should not be relied upon and should not be taken as a substitute for visiting a qualified medical Doctor.

Share

Comments